True or False: The policy discussed defines a situation in which harassment can occur even if there is no explicit intent to harass.

True or False: The policy discussed defines a situation in which harassment can occur even if there is no explicit intent to harass.

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Not sure
• D. Sometimes

Answer: (A)

Harassment policies focus on impact, not on the speaker’s intention. If a remark, gesture, or action is unwanted and creates a hostile or uncomfortable environment, it can be harassment even when there was no explicit intent to harass. So the statement is true because lack of explicit intent does not shield someone from harassment under most policy definitions—the harm or unwelcome nature of the conduct is what matters. The other options don’t fit because policies generally don’t require intent to prove harassment, and saying you’re unsure or sometimes would not align with a clear stance that harassment can occur without explicit intent.

Harassment policies focus on impact, not on the speaker’s intention. If a remark, gesture, or action is unwanted and creates a hostile or uncomfortable environment, it can be harassment even when there was no explicit intent to harass. So the statement is true because lack of explicit intent does not shield someone from harassment under most policy definitions—the harm or unwelcome nature of the conduct is what matters. The other options don’t fit because policies generally don’t require intent to prove harassment, and saying you’re unsure or sometimes would not align with a clear stance that harassment can occur without explicit intent.